Antibiotic Resistance, Meat Consumption and the Harm Principle

Ethics, Policy and Environment 26 (1):53-68 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. This paper investigates the viability of the harm principle (HP) to justify restricting consumer freedom regarding the purchase of products, such as meat, that require intense use of antibiotics...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21550085.2022.2137291

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Cultured meat, better than beans?C. N. Weele - 2017 - In Jessica Duncan & Megan Bailey (eds.). Routledge. pp. 163-174.
Taxing Meat: Taking Responsibility for One’s Contribution to Antibiotic Resistance.Hannah Maslen, Julian Savulescu, Thomas Douglas, Patrick Birkl & Alberto Giubilini - 2017 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (2):179-198.
Fake meat.William O. Stephens - 2018 - Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics.
An Exploratory Study of the Influence of Attitudes toward Animal Welfare on Meat Consumption in Ghana.Iddisah Sulemana & Awal Fuseini - 2018 - Food Ethics 2 (1):57-75.
Harm to Others: The social cost of antibiotics in agriculture.Jonny Anomaly - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (5):423-435.
The harm principle.Nils Holtug - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
Nonculpably Ignorant Meat Eaters & Epistemically Unjust Meat Producers.C. E. Abbate - 2020 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (9):46-54.
The Harm Principle and the Nature of Harm.Anna Folland - 2021 - Utilitas:1-15.
The Harm Principle and the Nature of Harm.Anna Folland - 2022 - Utilitas 34 (2):139-153.
In vitro Meat: The Normative Power of a Vision in the Innovation and Transformation Process.Inge Böhm, Silvia Woll & Arianna Ferrari - 2019 - In Andreas Lösch, Armin Grunwald, Martin Meister & Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer (eds.), Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present: Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 211-229.
The Problem of Justifying Animal-Friendly Animal Husbandry.Konstantin Deininger - 2022 - Transforming Food Systems: Ethics, Innovation and Responsibility.
Vegetarian meat: Could technology save animals and satisfy meat eaters?Patrick D. Hopkins & Austin Dacey - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6):579-596.
Stakeholders on Meat Production, Meat Consumption and Mitigation of Climate Change: Sweden as a Case. [REVIEW]Henrik Lerner, Bo Algers, Stefan Gunnarsson & Anders Nordgren - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (3):663-678.
Should market harms be an exception to the Harm Principle?Richard Endörfer - 2022 - Economics and Philosophy 38 (2):221-241.
“Harm” and Mill’s Harm Principle.Piers Norris Turner - 2014 - Ethics 124 (2):299-326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-14

Downloads
14 (#961,492)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Davide Fumagalli
University of Gothenburg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Causation.David Lewis - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (17):556-567.
Causation as influence.David Lewis - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):182-197.
Harm to Self.Joel Feinberg - 1986 - Oxford University Press USA.
What’s Wrong with Joyguzzling?Ewan Kingston & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (1):169-186.
Harm to Others.Joel Feinberg - 1984 - Oxford University Press USA.

View all 35 references / Add more references