On S

Studia Logica 53 (1):75 - 91 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The sentential logic S extends classical logic by an implication-like connective. The logic was first presented by Chellas as the smallest system modelled by contraining the Stalnaker-Lewis semantics for counterfactual conditionals such that the conditional is effectively evaluated as in the ternary relations semantics for relevant logics. The resulting logic occupies a key position among modal and substructural logics. We prove completeness results and study conditions for proceeding from one family of logics to another

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modal translations in substructural logics.Kosta Došen - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 21 (3):283 - 336.
A relevant theory of conditionals.Edwin D. Mares & André Fuhrmann - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (6):645 - 665.
Kripke semantics for modal substructural logics.Norihiro Kamide - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (4):453-470.
Relational proof system for relevant logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
Subintuitionistic Logics.Greg Restall - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):116-129.
Substructural Logics.Greg Restall - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
“Four-Valued” Semantics for the Relevant Logic R.Edwin D. Mares - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):327-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#193,318)

6 months
9 (#242,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Edwin Mares
Victoria University of Wellington
André Fuhrmann
Goethe University Frankfurt

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Basic conditional logic.Brian F. Chellas - 1975 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (2):133 - 153.

Add more references