Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):331 – 352 (1982)
AbstractAnti-naturalistic critics of Unity of Science have often tried to establish a fundamental difference between social and physical science on the grounds that research in the social field (unlike physical research) seems to interfere with the original situations so as to make accurate predictions impossible. A 'social' prediction may, e.g., itself influence the course of events so that the prediction proves false. H. A. Simon has dealt with such effects of predictions in a well-known article. Drawing on a mathematical theorem, Brouwer's so-called fixed-point theorem, he claims to prove that reactions to published predictions can be accounted for so that appropriately adjusted predictions can avoid being self-destructive. The present article is an attempt to show that Simon's use of the Brouwer theorem is misplaced, and that his proof does not parry the anti-naturalistic argument. Indeed, the burden of his proof is not really of a mathematical, but, it is argued, of a 'protosociological' kind. In conclusion, the article points to the fundamental inadequacy of a frame of reference which makes the 'interference' or 'reaction' effects due to people's having access to social knowledge appear strange or eccentric: as some kind of marginal irregularity causing trouble in the philosophy of (social) science.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Social Theory and Social Structure.Lawrence Haworth - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (44):345-346.
Explanation and Understanding.Georg Henrik von Wright - 1971 - London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences.May Brodbeck - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):174-175.
Citations of this work
Introduction to Symposium on ‘Reflexivity and Economics: George Soros's Theory of Reflexivity and the Methodology of Economic Science’.D. Wade Hands - 2013 - Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (4):303-308.
Similar books and articles
Election Predictions: Reply.Herbert A. Simon - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):361 – 364.
The Role of Mathematics in the Exploration of Reality.Karl Egil Aubert - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):353 – 359.
Area-to-Point Prediction Under Boundary Conditions.E. -H. Yoo & P. C. Kyriakidis - 2008 - Geographical Analysis 40 (4):355-379.
Catastrophe Theory: A Preliminary Critical Study.Hector J. Sussmann - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:256-286.
The Objectivity and Invariance of Quantum Predictions.Gordon N. Fleming - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:104 - 113.
Self-Defeating Predictions and the Fixed-Point Theorem: A Refutation. Audun - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):331 – 352.