Permanent Value

Journal of the American Philosophical Association 8 (2):356-372 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Temporal nihilism is the view that our lives won’t matter after we die. According to the standard interpretation, this is because our lives won’t make a permanent difference. Many who consider the view thus reject it by denying that our lives need to have an eternal impact. However, in this paper, I develop a different formulation of temporal nihilism revolving around the persistence of personal value itself. According to this stronger version, we do not have personal value after death, so our past life no longer has wellbeing after we die. The standard objections to the standard interpretation don’t apply to this more nihilistic nihilism. I offer a new response according to which personal value persists after death because the person continues to exist.

Similar books and articles

Nihilism before Nietzsche.Michael Allen Gillespie - 1995 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heidegger on the Absoluteness of Death.Nate Zuckerman - 2018 - New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 16.
The incoherence of soft nihilism.David Matheson - 2017 - Think 16 (47):127-135.
The Objectivity of Nihilism.Gregor Schiemann - 2016 - Divinatio. Studia Culturologica 41 (Autumn-winter 2015):7-29.
Melville and Nietzsche: Living the Death of God.Mark Anderson - 2016 - Philosophy and Literature 40 (1):59-75.
Mereological Nihilism and Theoretical Unification.Andrew Brenner - 2015 - Analytic Philosophy 56 (4):318-337.
Nihilism between “Prophecy” and Theory.Rita Šerpytytė - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 26:73-77.
Deleuze, Nietzsche, and the overcoming of nihilism.Ashley Woodward - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1):115-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-20

Downloads
835 (#17,270)

6 months
400 (#4,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Frugé
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Value After Death.Christopher Frugé - 2022 - Ratio 35 (3):194-203.
Combining Good and Bad.Christopher Frugé - forthcoming - In Mauro Rossi & Christine Tappolet (eds.), Perspectives on Ill-Being. Oxford University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Philosophical explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Timothy Williamson - 2013 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

View all 59 references / Add more references