Neither Owners Nor Guardians: In Search of a Morally Appropriate Model for the Keeping of Companion Animals

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (1):55-66 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The institution of owning pets has been subjected to compelling criticism on moral grounds. Yet advocates of a reformed, guardian/dependent model may yet face an abolitionist conclusion. We argue that treating companion animals as dependents entails an indefensible moral priority for them in the face of their guardians’ competing moral demands. An abolitionist dilemma arises as a result: if the property and reformed models fail, a morally acceptable characterization of the moral relationship between humans and their companion animals has yet to be articulated. We close by inviting others to develop plausible alternatives to the ownership and reformed models.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Duties to Companion Animals.Steve Cooke - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (3):261-274.
Dependent companions.Tony Milligan - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):402-413.
Dogs and human beings: A story of friendship.Sophia Menache - 1998 - Society and Animals 6 (1):67-86.
Is (merely) stalking sentient animals morally wrong?Jason Kawall - 2000 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):195–204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-07

Downloads
57 (#281,274)

6 months
6 (#522,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kyle Fruh
Duke Kunshan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2004 - Univ of California Press.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.
Animal rights and human morality.Bernard E. Rollin - 1981 - Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.

View all 18 references / Add more references