Towards a universal model of reading
Ram Frost, Christina Behme, Madeleine El Beveridge, Thomas H. Bak, Jeffrey S. Bowers, Max Coltheart, Stephen Crain, Colin J. Davis, S. Hélène Deacon & Laurie Beth Feldman
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):263 (2012)
Abstract
In the last decade, reading research has seen a paradigmatic shift. A new wave of computational models of orthographic processing that offer various forms of noisy position or context-sensitive coding have revolutionized the field of visual word recognition. The influx of such models stems mainly from consistent findings, coming mostly from European languages, regarding an apparent insensitivity of skilled readers to letter order. Underlying the current revolution is the theoretical assumption that the insensitivity of readers to letter order reflects the special way in which the human brain encodes the position of letters in printed words. The present article discusses the theoretical shortcomings and misconceptions of this approach to visual word recognition. A systematic review of data obtained from a variety of languages demonstrates that letter-order insensitivity is neither a general property of the cognitive system nor a property of the brain in encoding letters. Rather, it is a variant and idiosyncratic characteristic of some languages, mostly European, reflecting a strategy of optimizing encoding resources, given the specific structure of words. Since the main goal of reading research is to develop theories that describe the fundamental and invariant phenomena of reading across orthographies, an alternative approach to model visual word recognition is offered. The dimensions of a possible universal model of reading, which outlines the common cognitive operations involved in orthographic processing in all writing systems, are discussedAuthor's Profile
DOI
10.1017/s0140525x11001841
My notes
Similar books and articles
Bringing development into a universal model of reading.S. Hélène Deacon - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):284.
Can evolution provide perfectly optimal solutions for a universal model of reading?Christina Behme - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):279-280.
Position-invariant letter identification is a key component of any universal model of reading.Jeffrey S. Bowers - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):281-282.
Developing a universal model of reading necessitates cracking the orthographic code.Colin J. Davis - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):283-284.
Consideration of the linguistic characteristics of letters makes the universal model of reading more universal.Kyungil Kim, Chang H. Lee & Yoonhyoung Lee - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):291-292.
An even more universal model of reading: Various effects of orthography on dyslexias.Naama Friedmann & Aviah Gvion - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):285-286.
Are there universals of reading? We don't believe so.Max Coltheart & Stephen Crain - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):282-283.
Model companions for finitely generated universal horn classes.Stanley Burris - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1):68-74.
Flashing out or fleshing out? A developmental perspective on a universal model of reading.Bruce D. Homer, Russell Miller & Seamus Donnelly - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):289-290.
The e-z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models.Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner & Alexander Pollatsek - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):445-476.
Vision, development, and bilingualism are fundamental in the quest for a universal model of visual word recognition and reading.Nicola J. Pitchford, Walter J. B. van Heuven, Andrew N. Kelly, Taoli Zhang & Timothy Ledgeway - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):300-301.
The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: An evaluation of the e-z reader model.Laurent Sparrow, Sébastien Miellet & Yann Coello - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):503-505.
Nonexistence of universal orders in many cardinals.Menachem Kojman & Saharon Shelah - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (3):875-891.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-27
Downloads
59 (#202,987)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
2013-10-27
Downloads
59 (#202,987)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
How language affects children's use of derivational morphology in visual word and pseudoword processing: evidence from a cross-language study.Séverine Casalis, Pauline Quémart & Lynne G. Duncan - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Skilled readers’ sensitivity to meaningful regularities in English writing.Anastasia Ulicheva, Hannah Harvey, Mark Aronoff & Kathleen Rastle - 2020 - Cognition 195 (C):103810.
Reconsidering the role of orthographic redundancy in visual word recognition.Fabienne Chetail - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
The Neuronal Recycling Hypothesis for Reading and the Question of Reading Universals.Max Coltheart - 2014 - Mind and Language 29 (3):255-269.
Functional neuroanatomy of developmental dyslexia: the role of orthographic depth.Fabio Richlan - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
References found in this work
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition.James J. Gibson - 1979 - Houghton Mifflin.
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis.Jerry A. Fodor & Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1988 - Cognition 28 (1-2):3-71.