Selection bias in using data from one population to another: Common pitfalls in the interpretation of medical literature

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 13 (3) (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The prevalence, course and prognosis of diseases in patients referred to tertiary medical centers frequently differ from those treated in primary care settings. Extrapolation of findings from one population to another may therefore be unwarranted. Other factors that contribute to misinterpretation of medical literature include failure to distinguish statistical from clinical significance and advocacy of medical interventions prior to adequate clinical trials.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#212,341)

6 months
3 (#210,327)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references