Prudentia Iuris [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 43 (2):418-420 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This work is essentially an attempt to refute the theory of legal positivism, and at the same time to advance the author's own somewhat unique formulation of natural law theory. Though Juha-Pekka Rentto makes a comprehensive and almost eclectic use of authors as diverse as, for example, Thomas Aquinas and Lawrence Kohlberg, he seems determined to approach legal philosophy from the natural law tradition, while adding a few notable exceptions of his own. In his opinion, natural law theories which attempt to build a system on some one first principle ignore the practical importance of natural law. In fact, he will go on to say later that "rule-like principles are otiose in that they either are against the appropriate reasons for action, or they add nothing to them". His own via media involves an interesting twist on Finnis's theory of practical reason.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Ars iuris” und “suum in persona ipsa” bei Hugo donellus.Heribert Waider - 1961 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 43 (1):52-69.
Aquinas and dōgen and virtues.Douglas K. Mikkelson - 2005 - Philosophy East and West 55 (4):542-569.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
21 (#711,668)

6 months
5 (#632,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references