Part Structures, Integrity, and the Mass-Count Distinction

Synthese 116 (1):75 - 111 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The notions of part and whole play an important role for ontology and in many areas of the semantics of natural language. Both in philosophy and linguistic semantics, usually a particular notion of part structure is used, that of extensional mereology. This paper argues that such a notion is insufficient for ontology and, especially, for the semantic analysis of the relevant constructions of natural language. What is needed for the notion of part structure, in addition to an ordering among parts, is the notion of integrated whole. In the context of semantics, the notion of an integrated whole needs to be relativized to a situation, or so it is argued.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
465 (#39,610)

6 months
55 (#76,483)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Friederike Moltmann
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

Composition.Daniel Z. Korman & Chad Carmichael - 2016 - Oxford Handbooks Online.
Natural Language Ontology.Friederike Moltmann - 2017 - Oxford Encyclopedia of Linguistics.
Plurals and complexes.Keith Hossack - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):411-443.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Parts: a study in ontology.Peter M. Simons - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Parts : a Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2:277-279.
Parts and Wholes in Semantics.Friederike Moltmann - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Direct Reference.Francois Recanati - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):953-956.

View all 11 references / Add more references