Moral heuristics and the means/end distinction

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):549-550 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A mental heuristic is a shortcut (means) to a desired end. In the moral (as opposed to factual) realm, the means/end distinction is not self-evident: How do we decide whether a given moral intuition is a mere heuristic to achieve some freestanding moral principle, or instead a freestanding moral principle in its own right? I discuss Sunstein's solution to that threshold difficulty in translating “heuristics” to the moral realm.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cognitivism, controversy, and moral heuristics.Matthew D. Adler - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):542-543.
On moral intuitions and moral heuristics: A response.Cass R. Sunstein - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):565-570.
Moral heuristics.Cass R. Sunstein - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):531-542.
Towards an intuitionist account of moral development.Karen Bartsch & Jennifer Cole Wright - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):546-547.
The end can justify the means--but rarely.Warren G. Bovee - 1991 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 6 (3):135 – 145.
A selectionist approach integrates moral heuristics.Robert A. Hinde - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):555-556.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#214,281)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references