Evenly Suspended Distractive Attention

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 18 (1/2):84-101 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article reviews recent cognitive and neurological approaches to the study of attention. It argues that such research is based on the notion that attention has a positive cognitive function selecting, like a sieve or a filter, elements from the background and foreground, to then be processed by the brain and made conscious when required. These approaches fail to explain cognitive overload and recent findings demonstrating that recognition and understanding—sensory, visual and semantic—also occur prior to attention. Merleau-Ponty and Freud offer a different model: a negative distractive attention. Negative distractive attention serves as a threshold for stimuli excluded by neurological processes regulating overload and ensuring that consciousness can concentrate on the singularity of its objects. Such approach to attention explains how one can drive and talk. It is not a positive multi-tasking model but a negative distractive one

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Suspended judgment.Jane Friedman - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):165-181.
Response to “Advance Directives and Voluntary Slavery” by Christopher Tollefsen.Thomas May - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):358-363.
Visual Prominence and Representationalism.Todd Ganson & Ben Bronner - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (2):405-418.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-28

Downloads
37 (#419,437)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references