Ethics and Epistemic Hopelessness

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (6):977–1005 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper investigates the ethics of regarding others as epistemically hopeless. To regard a person as epistemically hopeless with respect to p is, roughly, to regard her as unable to see the truth of p through rational means. Regarding a person as epistemically hopeless is a stance that has surprising and nuanced moral implications. It can be a sign of respect, and it can also be a way of giving up on someone. Whether it is morally problematic to take up this stance, I argue, depends on the choices that one faces (or is likely to face). I close the paper by arguing against the view that there are standing moral reasons against regarding others as epistemically hopeless.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

701 (#24,969)

6 months
188 (#16,804)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Fritz
Virginia Commonwealth University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Doxastic Wronging.Rima Basu & Mark Schroeder - 2019 - In Brian Kim & Matthew McGrath (eds.), Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 181-205.

View all 27 references / Add more references