Deconstructing Ought Implies Can

Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:109-115 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present paper aims to view three ways of thinking time by Emmanuel Levinas. We distinguish existential, historical, and eschatological time demonstrating how they are connected with his central notion of responsibility toward the Other. The following analysis reorders and interprets what Levinas has said in response of Martin Heidegger’s and Hegel’s position. The text does not make any other claims but aims to offer a possible reading and exegesis of Levinas’s philosophy and open a further discussion on these topics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emmanuel Levinas.Maria Dimitrova - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:69-76.
The torah of Levinasian time.L. I. N. Yael - 2012 - Heythrop Journal 53 (1):81-99.
On escape =.Emmanuel Lévinas (ed.) - 2003 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
In/finite Time: Tracing Transcendence to Emmanuel Levinas's Talmudic Lectures.Ethan Kleinberg - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (3):375-387.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
38 (#409,607)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references