Areo (2021)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Michael Goldhaber, who popularized the term the attention economy, said of the US Capitol insurrection: “It felt like an expression of a world in which everyone is desperately seeking their own audience and fracturing reality in the process. I only see that accelerating.” If we don’t do something about this, American democracy may not survive. For when there is no longer any common ground of evidence and reason, history shows that misinformation will eventually overwhelm public discourse and authoritarianism can take over. That is precisely what dictators across the world gleefully anticipate will happen in the US. The Biden administration could combat this by establishing a digital fairness doctrine for the twenty-first century. This would not mean setting up a government agency as the arbiter of truth. The purpose of such a doctrine is simply to preserve the possibility of a functioning national discourse on critical issues of public interest. It would not run afoul of First Amendment free speech guarantees, given that it would do nothing to block speech itself. In fact, it would expand and enrich national conversations, by preventing echo chambers prone to systematic bias.
|
Keywords | False news, free speech, media accuracy, micro-targeting |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Free Speech and the Legal Prohibition of Fake News.Étienne Brown - forthcoming - Social Theory and Practice.
Media Ethics, Free Speech, and the Requirements of Democracy.Joe Saunders & Carl Fox (eds.) - 2019 - Routledge.
Substantive Media Regulations in the Twenty-First Century: A Fair Look at the Fairness Doctrine.Justin Fisher - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 25 (1):305.
Free Speech and Liberal Community.Gerald Lang - 2019 - In Carl Fox & Joe Saunders (eds.), Media Ethics, Free Speech, and the Requirements of Democracy. London, UK: pp. 105-123.
In the Spirit of the Law: An Ethical Alternative to the Fairness Doctrine.James L. Schwar - 1995 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (2):83 – 94.
A Defence of Free Speech.Richard McDonough - 1989 - In Cedric Pan Jaganathan Muraleenathan (ed.), Thinking about Democracy. pp. 61-84.
The Obligation to Diversify One's Sources: Against Epistemic Partisanship in the Consumption of News Media.Alex Worsnip - 2019 - In Carl Fox & Joe Saunders (eds.), Media Ethics: Free Speech and the Requirements of Democracy. London: Routledge. pp. 240-264.
The American Media Experience.Daniel W. Hollis - 2018 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 30 (1-2):29-47.
The Role of Mass Media in Church Development in the Twenty First Century.Offiong O. Asuquo - unknown
Why Do You Trust News? The Event-Related Potential Evidence of Media Channel and News Type.Bonai Fan, Sifang Liu, Guanxiong Pei, Yufei Wu & Lian Zhu - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Free Speech on Social Media: How to Protect Our Freedoms From Social Media That Are Funded by Trade in Our Personal Data.Richard Sorabji - 2020 - Social Philosophy and Policy 37 (2):209-236.
The Effects of News Frames and Political Speech Sources on Political Attitudes: The Moderating Role of Values.Claes de Vreese, Peter Neijens, Andreas Schuck & Moniza Waheed - 2015 - Communications 40 (2):147-169.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-07-09
Total views
198 ( #57,609 of 2,497,775 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
152 ( #3,997 of 2,497,775 )
2021-07-09
Total views
198 ( #57,609 of 2,497,775 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
152 ( #3,997 of 2,497,775 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads