Why localist connectionist models are inadequate for categorization

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):477-477 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two categorization arguments pose particular problems for localist connectionist models. The internal representations of localist networks do not reflect the variability within categories in the environment, whereas networks with distributed internal representations do reflect this essential feature of categories. We provide a real biological example of perceptual categorization in the monkey that seems to require population coding (i.e., distributed internal representations).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sticking to the manifesto.Mike Page - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):496-505.
Localist representations and theoretical clarity.Norman D. Cook - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):474-475.
Localist but distributed representations.Stephen Grossberg - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):478-479.
Localism as a first step toward symbolic representation.John E. Hummel - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):480-481.
Localist network modelling in psychology: Ho-hum or hm-m-m?Craig Leth-Steensen - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):484-485.
Connectionist modelling in psychology: A localist manifesto.Mike Page - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):443-467.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#557,528)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references