The evolutionary route to self-deception: Why offensive versus defensive strategy might be a false alternative

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):21-22 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Self-deception may be the result of social manipulation and conflict management of social in-groups. Although self-deception certainly has offensive and defensive aspects, a full evolutionary understanding of this phenomenon is not possible until strategies of other parties are included into a model of self-perception and self-representation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Seeing Through Self-Deception.Annette Barnes - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Varieties of self-deception.Robert F. Bornstein - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):108-109.
Self-deceived about self-deception: An evolutionary analysis.Mario Heilmann - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):116-117.
Bald Lies.Mark Nelson - 1996 - Cogito 10 (3):235-237.
What is the role of the self in self-deception?Richard Holton - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):53-69.
Self-deception.Stanley Paluch - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):268-278.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
23 (#666,649)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How We Know What Isn't So.Thomas Gilovich - 1993 - New York, NY, USA: Free Press.
Mirrors for embodied communication.Wolfgang Prinz - 2008 - In Ipke Wachsmuth, Manuela Lenzen & Günther Knoblich (eds.), Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines. Oxford University Press.

Add more references