| Abstract |
Moral dissensus may arise first because persons may disagree over the warrants licensing inferring an evaluative conclusion from premises asserting that properties alleged evaluatively relevant hold. This results in seeing different properties as evaluatively relevant. Secondly, such properties will frequently not be descriptive but interpretive, asserting some nomic connection. Persons may disagree over what evaluatively relevant properties hold in a given case. We explore the possibilities for argumentation to resolve these two types of disagreement.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links
- scholar.uwindsor.ca
(no proxy) - scholar.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- scholar.uwindsor.ca [3] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
References found in this work BETA
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Rogers Searle - 1969 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
The Probable and the Provable.Laurence Jonathan Cohen - 1977 - Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press.
Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge.Nicholas Rescher - 1977 - State University of New York Press.
View all 22 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Is Common Ground a Word or Just a Sound? Second Order Consensus and Argumentation Theory.Cantù Paola & Testa Italo - 2007 - In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. OSSA.
Consensus and Dissensus in Science.Robert Ackermann - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:99 - 105.
Resolving Deep Disagreement.Vesel Memedi - 2007 - In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Ossa.
Dissensus as Value and Practice in Cultural Argument: The Tangled Web of Argument, Con/Dis-Sensus, Values and Cultural Variations.Michael David Hazen - 2007 - In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Ossa.
Moral Realism: Best Explanation Arguments and Conceptual Analysis.Michael Yaziji - 1995 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Argumentation in Ethics, Legal Dogmatics and Legal Practice.Aleksander Peczenik - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):747-756.
Anticipating Objections as a Way of Coping with Dissensus.Ralph H. Johnson - 2007 - In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Ossa.
Moral Properties: Foundation of the Metaphysics of Morals.James Carl Klagge - 1983 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Rational Interaction for Moral Sensitivity: A Postmodern Approach to Moral Decision-Making in Business. [REVIEW]G. J. Rossouw - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (1):11 - 20.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-04-02
Total views
10 ( #903,150 of 2,518,692 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,692 )
2015-04-02
Total views
10 ( #903,150 of 2,518,692 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,692 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
