Moral community and animal research in medicine

Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):123 – 136 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The invocation of moral rights in moral/social debate today is a recipe for deadlock in our consideration of substantive issues. How we treat animals and humans in part should derive from the value of their lives, which is a function of the quality of their lives, which in turn is a function of the richness of their lives. Consistency in argument requires that humans with a low quality of life should be chosen as experimental subjects over animals with a higher quality of life.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal rights: moral theory and practice.Mark Rowlands - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Animal rights: a very short introduction.David DeGrazia (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
On exploiting inferiors.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Between the Species 11 (1-2):1--24.
Moral agency in other animals.Paul Shapiro - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
Comparing Lives: Rush Rhees on Humans and Animals.Matthew Pianalto - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):287-311.
Popular media and animals.Claire Molloy - 2011 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
The rights of humans and other animals.Tom Regan - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):103 – 111.
On justifying the exploitation of animals in research.S. F. Sapontzis - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):177-196.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
101 (#168,438)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Reed Frey
University of Pittsburgh