| Authors | |
| Abstract |
I distinguish arguments and arguing and I explain some important logical features of arguments. I then explain how philosophers have been misled, apparently by Euclid, into giving seriously mistaken accounts of arguing. I give a few examples. I then offer a seven-step guide on how to argue. After that, I conclude.
|
| Keywords | argument argumentation critical thinking informal logic epistemology Karl Popper valid sound criticism conjecture |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 69,160
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments.Leo Groarke - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (3):312-340.
The Contrast Between Dogmatic and Critical Arguments.Danny Frederick - 2015 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 22 (1):9-20.
Argument. Appreciation! Argument-Criticism: The "Aesthetics" of Informal Logic.Joel Rudinow - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (2).
Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):271-291.
A Regimented and Concise Exposition of Karl Popper’s Critical Rationalist Epistemology (Version 2).Danny Frederick - manuscript
Is Formal Logic a Science About Rational Arguments?Svatopluk Nevrkla - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (4):499-511.
Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic.Michael A. Gilbert - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (3):245-264.
Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation.Douglas Neil Walton - 1989 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Valid Ad Hominem Arguments in Philosophy: Johnstone's Metaphilosophical Informal Logic.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
Critical Thinking, A Deflated Defense: A Critical Study of John E. McPeck's Teaching Critical Thinking: Dialogue and Dialectic.Jonathan E. Adler - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (2).
Falsificationism and the Pragmatic Problem of Induction.Danny Frederick - 2020 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 27 (4):494-503.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-08-12
Total views
109 ( #106,276 of 2,499,433 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #62,916 of 2,499,433 )
2020-08-12
Total views
109 ( #106,276 of 2,499,433 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #62,916 of 2,499,433 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
