Apodeictic syllogisms: Deductions and decision procedures

History and Philosophy of Logic 16 (1):1-18 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One semantic and two syntactic decision procedures are given for determining the validity of Aristotelian assertoric and apodeictic syllogisms. Results are obtained by using the Aristotelian deductions that necessarily have an even number of premises.

Similar books and articles

When Transmission Fails.Chris Tucker - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (4):497-529.
A New Approach to Aristotle's Apodeictic Syllogisms.Nicholas Rescher & Zane Parks - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):678 - 689.
Extended Gergonne Syllogisms.Fred Johnson - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (5):553-567.
S4 and Aristotle on Three Syllogisms with Contingent Premisses.Charles J. Kelly - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:405-431.
The Logical Deduction of Doctrine.Dermot Cassidy - 2013 - Heythrop Journal 54 (2):203-213.
Syllogisms with fractional quantifiers.Fred Johnson - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (4):401 - 422.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
423 (#44,234)

6 months
97 (#40,016)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frederick Johnson
Colorado State University

References found in this work

Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics.W. D. Ross - 1949 - Philosophy 25 (95):380-382.
What is a syllogism?Timothy J. Smiley - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (1):136 - 154.
Models for modal syllogisms.Fred Johnson - 1989 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (2):271-284.
Aristotle's Modal Syllogisms.Ruth Barcan Marcus & Storrs McCall - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (4):539.

View all 8 references / Add more references