Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):689-709 (2010)
AbstractThe Tree of Life has traditionally been understood to represent the history of species lineages. However, recently researchers have suggested that it might be better interpreted as representing the history of cellular lineages, sometimes called the Tree of Cells. This paper examines and evaluates reasons offered against this cellular interpretation of the Tree of Life. It argues that some such reasons are bad reasons, based either on a false attribution of essentialism, on a misunderstanding of the problem of lineage identity, or on a limited view of scientific representation. I suggest that debate about the Tree of Cells and other successors to the traditional Tree of Life should be formulated in terms of the purposes these representations may serve. In pursuing this strategy, we see that the Tree of Cells cannot serve one purpose suggested for it: as an explanation for the hierarchical nature of taxonomy. We then explore whether, instead, the tree may play an important role in the dynamic modeling of evolution. As highly-integrated complex systems, cells may influence which lineage components can successfully transfer into them and how they change once integrated. Only if they do in fact have a substantial role to play in this process might the Tree of Cells have some claim to be the Tree of Life.
Similar books and articles
The Equivalence of Tree Adjoining Grammars and Monadic Linear Context-Free Tree Grammars.Stephan Kepser & Jim Rogers - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (3):361-384.
The Tree of Life: Introduction to an Evolutionary Debate. [REVIEW]Maureen A. O’Malley, William Martin & John Dupré - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):441-453.
The Myth of Bacterial Species and Speciation.Jeffrey G. Lawrence & Adam C. Retchless - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):569-588.
Ernst Mayr, the Tree of Life, and Philosophy of Biology.Maureen A. O’Malley - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):529-552.
Doug Elliott: Swarm Tree: Of Honeybees, Honeymoons and the Tree of Life: The Natural History Press, Charleston, South Carolina, 2009, 160 Pp. ISBN 978.1.59629.675.6. [REVIEW]Charles Francis - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (5):487-489.
Tree of Life, Tree of Knowledge: Conversations with the Torah.Michael Rosenak - 2001 - Westview Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Future of Systematics: Tree Thinking Without the Tree.Joel D. Velasco - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (5):624-636.
Natural Taxonomy in Light of Horizontal Gene Transfer.Cheryl P. Andam, David Williams & J. Peter Gogarten - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):589-602.
Horizontal Persistence and the Complexity Hypothesis.Aaron Novick & W. Ford Doolittle - 2020 - Biology and Philosophy 35 (1):2.
Images of Cell Trees, Cell Lines, and Cell Fates: The Legacy of Ernst Haeckel and August Weismann in Stem Cell Research.Dröscher Ariane - 2014 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36 (2):157-186.
Gene Sharing and Genome Evolution: Networks in Trees and Trees in Networks.Robert G. Beiko - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):659-673.
References found in this work
The Sciences of the Artificial.Herbert Alexander Simon - 1969 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: [Cambridge, M.I.T. Press.
The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language.Steven Pinker - 1994/2007 - Harper Perennial.