Analytic Philosophy 52 (4):319-327 (2011)

Michael L. Frazer
University of East Anglia
Michael Slote’s Moral Sentimentalism is a wonderful model of a particular, under-appreciated philosophical method. It demonstrates that exciting, original work can be created by putting old ideas to new uses, proving once again that the classics of moral and political philosophy offer too rich an array of intellectual resources to leave to historians alone. Whenever one is reclaiming old ideas, however, the most important decision is which ideas to reclaim, and which to leave in the dustbin of history. Slote makes use of many ideas drawn from history’s greatest moral sentimentalist, David Hume, but he rejects many others. The work of Hume’s closest friend and greatest sentimentalist ally, Adam Smith, is rejected without adequate explanation. Smith is mentioned, but quickly dismissed. Yet even though Smith makes little contribution to Slote’s own version of sentimentalism, I think he deserved greater discussion in this book. Smith and Slote address many of the same subjects, using the same basic sentimentalist approach, but they come to very different conclusions. It is thus possible to construct a fruitful debate between them—a debate in which, since he can no longer speak on his own behalf, I will be taking Smith’s side.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.2153-960X.2011.00544.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Sentimentalism * by Michael Slote.A. M. Smith - 2011 - Analysis 71 (1):197-200.
Comments on Michael Slote's Moral Sentimentalism.Lori Watson - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):142-147.
Empathy, Approval, and Disapproval in Moral Sentimentalism.Justin D'arms - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):134-141.
Slote's Satisficing Consequentialism.Tim Mulgan - 1993 - Ratio 6 (2):121 - 134.
From Morality to Virtue.Michael Slote - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Rightness and Goodness in Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.Liezl Van Zyl - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:103-114.
Is Virtue Possible?Michael Slote - 1982 - Analysis 42 (2):70 - 76.
Even If.Allen Hazen & Michael Slote - 1979 - Analysis 39 (1):35 - 38.
Entrenchment and Validity.Michael A. Slote - 1974 - Analysis 34 (6):204 - 207.


Added to PP index

Total views
40 ( #281,618 of 2,499,613 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,712 of 2,499,613 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes