Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (3):305-323 (2017)

Authors
Sven Nyholm
Utrecht University
Lily Frank
Eindhoven University of Technology
Abstract
The development of highly humanoid sex robots is on the technological horizon. If sex robots are integrated into the legal community as “electronic persons”, the issue of sexual consent arises, which is essential for legally and morally permissible sexual relations between human persons. This paper explores whether it is conceivable, possible, and desirable that humanoid robots should be designed such that they are capable of consenting to sex. We consider reasons for giving both “no” and “yes” answers to these three questions by examining the concept of consent in general, as well as critiques of its adequacy in the domain of sexual ethics; the relationship between consent and free will; and the relationship between consent and consciousness. Additionally we canvass the most influential existing literature on the ethics of sex with robots.
Keywords Sex robots  Rape  Artificial Intelligence  Consent  Legal community  Free will
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10506-017-9212-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - Oxford University Press USA.

View all 45 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Oppressive Things.Shen-yi Liao & Bryce Huebner - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (1):92-113.
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics.Vincent C. Müller - 2020 - In Edward Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Palo Alto, Cal.: CSLI, Stanford University. pp. 1-70.
There Is No Techno-Responsibility Gap.Daniel W. Tigard - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (3):589-607.
Robots and Sexual Ethics.Brian D. Earp & Katarzyna Grunt-Mejer - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (1):1-2.
Can a Robot Be a Good Colleague?Sven Nyholm & Jilles Smids - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2169-2188.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Consent, Coercion, and Sexual Autonomy.Jeffrey A. Gauthier - 1999 - In Keith Burgess-Jackson (ed.), A Most Detestable Crime: New Philosophical Essays on Rape. Oxford University Press. pp. 71-91.
Consent to Sexual Relations.Alan Wertheimer - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
Consent to Sexual Relations.Alan Wertheimer - 2006 - Law and Philosophy 25 (2):267-287.
Robotrust and Legal Responsibility.Ugo Pagallo - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3):367-379.
Autonomy, Consent and the Law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Unintentional Consent.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2015 - Kritike 9 (1):86-95.
A Defense of Subsequent Consent.Eric Chwang - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):117-131.
On the Very Idea of Sex with Robots.Mark Migotti & Nicole Wyatt - 2018 - In John Danaher & Neil McArthur (eds.), Robot Sex: Social Implications and Ethical. MIT. pp. 15-27.
Sexual Assault and the Mens Rea Problem: The Empathic Approach.Kristie Hirschenberger - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-08-31

Total views
193 ( #56,574 of 2,462,535 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #36,735 of 2,462,535 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes