On the parallel between mathematics and morals

Philosophy 79 (1):97-119 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The imperviousness of mathematical truth to anti-objectivist attacks has always heartened those who defend objectivism in other areas, such as ethics. It is argued that the parallel between mathematics and ethics is close and does support objectivist theories of ethics. The parallel depends on the foundational role of equality in both disciplines. Despite obvious differences in their subject matter, mathematics and ethics share a status as pure forms of knowledge, distinct from empirical sciences. A pure understanding of principles is possible because of the simplicity of the notion of equality, despite the different origins of our understanding of equality of objects in general and of the equality of the ethical worth of persons.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
515 (#34,529)

6 months
108 (#35,499)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Franklin
University of New South Wales

References found in this work

The Idea of Moral Progress.Michele M. Moody-Adams - 1999 - Metaphilosophy 30 (3):168-185.
Ultimate principles and ethical egoism.Brian Medlin - 1957 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 35 (2):111 – 118.
Equality and Desert.Louis Pojman - 1997 - Philosophy 72 (282):549 - 570.
Mathematical necessity and reality.James Franklin - 1989 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 (3):286 – 294.
The diversity of morals.F. E. Snare - 1980 - Mind 89 (355):353-369.

View all 7 references / Add more references