Justifying a Large Part of Philosophy

Think 18 (51):93-99 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I explain why research in non-applied, non-interdisciplinary, non-historical philosophy is worthwhile. The key move in the explanation is the realization that many philosophical problems can be put in the form of a set of highly plausible yet apparently jointly inconsistent claims regarding a fundamental notion.Export citation.

Similar books and articles

Metaphilosophy in the Systems of Metatheories.Georg Brutian - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (3):294-305.
Hegel's metaphilosophy and historical metamorphosis.R. Ware - 1996 - History of Political Thought 17 (2):253-279.
Philosophy and other disciplines.Sven Ove Hansson - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):472-483.
The Science of Philosophy.Colin McGinn - 2015 - Metaphilosophy 46 (1):84-103.
Creating the journal metaphilosophy.Terrell Ward Bynum - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (3):186-190.
Metaphilosophy.Yuri Cath - 2011 - Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy.
Philosophical Renegades.Bryan Frances - 2013 - In Jennifer Lackey & David Christensen (eds.), The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 121-166.
Justifying a Curriculum and Justifying an Institution.W. N. Gray & J. F. Wyatt - 1985 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 2 (1):63-68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-25

Downloads
945 (#14,217)

6 months
79 (#54,804)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references