DSM-IV Meets Philosophy

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (3):207-218 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The authors discuss some of the conceptual issues that must be considered in using and understanding psychiatric classification. DSM-IV is a practical and common sense nosology of psychiatric disorders that is intended to improve communication in clinical practice and in research studies. DSM-IV has no philosophic pretensions but does raise many philosphical questions. This paper describes the development of DSM-IV and the way in which it addresses a number of philosophic issues: nominalism vs. realism, epistemology in science, the mind/body dichotomy, the definition of mental disorders, and dimensional vs. categorical classification

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On values in recent american psychiatric classification.J. Agich George - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (3).
The little woman meets son of dsm-III.Karen Ritchie - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (6):695-708.
What is wrong with the DSM?Rachel Cooper - 2004 - History of Psychiatry 15 (1):5-25.
The concept of mental disorder and the DSM-V.Massimiliano Aragona - 2009 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 2 (1):1-14.
Clinicians' folk taxonomies of mental disorders.Elizabeth H. Flanagan Roger K. Blashfield - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (3):pp. 249-269.
Foundations of the new nosology.Mark J. Sedler - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (3):219-238.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
79 (#203,897)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references