A New Contractarian View of Tax and Regulatory Policy in the Emerging Market Economies

Social Philosophy and Policy 10 (2):258-281 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Recent decades have seen a resurgence of contractarian thinking about the nature and origins of the state. Scholars in this tradition ask what constraints rational, self-interested actors might deliberately impose upon themselves. In response, Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke, and other early contractarians answered that laws of property were an attractive alternative to “the war of all against all.” More recently, James Buchanan, Russell Hardin, Mancur Olson, Gordon Tullock, and others have used contractarian principles to justify laws that solve a variety of Prisoner's Dilemmas and other collective-action problems. And in the distributional realm, John Rawls and others have applied contractarian analysis to investigate how material wealth ought to be allocated among people.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,678

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Plato and the Social Contract.Sheldon Wein - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:67-77.
Plato and the Social Contract.Sheldon Wein - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:67-77.
Contractarianism and Interspecies Welfare Conflicts.Andrew I. Cohen - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):227-257.
Contractarianism and the assumption of mutual unconcern.Peter Vallentyne - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 56 (2):187 - 192.
Contract and Consent.Jean Hampton - 1996 - In Robert E. Goodin, Philip Pettit & Thomas Winfried Menko Pogge (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 478–492.


Added to PP

37 (#429,415)

6 months
7 (#622,277)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references