Are dispositions reducible to categorical properties?

Philosophical Quarterly 36 (142):62-64 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dispostions, such as solubility, cannot be reduced to categorical properties, such as molecular structure, without some element of dipositionaity remaining. Democritus did not reduce all properties to the geometry of atoms - he had to retain the rigidity of the atoms, that is, their disposition not to change shape when a force is applied. So dispositions-not-to, like rigidity, cannot be eliminated. Neither can dispositions-to, like solubility.

Similar books and articles

Dispositions in Physics.Andreas Hüttemann - 2009 - In Gregor Damschen, Robert Schnepf & Karsten Stueber (eds.), Debating Dispositions. De Gruyter. pp. 221-237.
Dispositions and the Argument from Science.Neil E. Williams - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):71 - 90.
Unfinkable dispositions.Toby Handfield - 2008 - Synthese 160 (2):297 - 308.
A case for extrinsic dispositions.Jennifer McKitrick - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):155 – 174.
Are physical properties dispositions?Edward Wilson Averill - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):118-132.
Goodbye, Humean Supervenience.Troy Cross - 2012 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 7:129-153.
Ungrounded Dispositions in Quantum Mechanics.Tomasz Bigaj - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (3):205-221.
Reply to Armstrong on dispositions.James Franklin - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (150):86-87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
473 (#38,654)

6 months
88 (#47,472)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Franklin
University of New South Wales

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references