William Franke
Vanderbilt University
On the one hand, we find secularized approaches to theology stemming from the Death of God movement of the 1960s, particularly as pursued by North American religious thinkers such as Thomas J.J. Altizer, Mark C. Taylor, Charles Winquist, Carl Raschke, Robert Scharlemann, and others, who stress that the possibilities for theological discourse are fundamentally altered by the new conditions of our contemporary world. Our world today, in their view, is constituted wholly on a plane of immanence, to such an extent that traditional appeals to faith in an other world become difficult to take as more than self-deception and willful blindness to our human reality. On the other hand, we hear the assertion of a new lease on life for theology and its traditional affirmation of divine transcendence over and against the putative arrogance of all claims of human autonomy. This claim is advanced particularly by theologians grouped under the banner of the so-called Radical Orthodoxy. Emanating from England, originally from the University of Cambridge in the 1980s and 1990s, this movement includes such theological thinkers as John Milbank, Graham Ward, Rowan Williams, and Catherine Pickstock. It has also explicitly styled itself “post-secularist.” I propose that both approaches are based on not very fully acknowledged and often explicitly denied premises in negative theology, which surprisingly emerges as key to fostering genuine possibilities for dialogue among apparently antagonistic theological approaches
Keywords Secular theology  Radical Orthodoxy  Negative theology  Apophasis  Post-secular  Radical  Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-012-9360-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logique de Sens.Gilles Deleuze - 1969 - Editions de Minuit.
Logique du Sens.Gilles Deleuze - 1969 - Editions de Minuit.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Radical Orthodoxy: An Appreciation.David B. Burrell - 2004 - Philosophy and Theology 16 (1):73-76.
“Pro Salute Nostra Reparanda”: Radical Orthodoxy's Christology of Manifestation Versus Augustine's Moral Christology.Maarten Wisse - 2008 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 49 (3):349-376.
Divine and Human Agency in the Work of Social Justice: Liberation Theology Responds to Radical Orthodoxy.Donald J. Musacchio - 2005 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:279-288.
Radical Orthodoxy and Christian Philosophy.John Montag - 2004 - Philosophy and Theology 16 (1):89-100.
Hegel’s Secular Theology.Joseph Prabhu - 2010 - Sophia 49 (2):217–29.
Miracles and Radical Theology.Roger A. Shiner - 1975 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 13 (3):383-392.
Divine Revelation and Human Person.Balázs M. Mezei - 2006 - Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):337-354.


Added to PP index

Total views
26 ( #436,895 of 2,499,868 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,749 of 2,499,868 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes