Notes on Pighius and Valerius Maximus

Classical Quarterly 38 (1):262-264 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Horace, Janus, and Pighius' Acta In PBSR 54, 213–28 Andrew Lintott dusts down the fragments of the Acta Urbana published by S. V. Pighius in 1615 and universally supposed today to be a forgery. Lintott himself, after a most learned discussion, concurs, but one senses a wistful longing for the fragments to be genuine. The purpose of this note is to offer another reason why sadly this is unlikely.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Notes on Pighius and Valerius Maximus.D. P. Fowler - 1988 - Classical Quarterly 38 (01):262-.
Was Valerius Maximus a Hack?Tara Welch - 2013 - American Journal of Philology 134 (1):67-82.
Valerius Maximus. [REVIEW]Peter K. Marshall - 2000 - The Classical Review 50 (2):457-458.
Valerius Maximus vii. 7. 7: Addendum.Robin Seager - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (03):314-.
The Budé Valerius Maximus. [REVIEW]John Briscoe - 1999 - The Classical Review 49 (1):76-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
11 (#1,110,001)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references