- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Response
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (4):383-384 (2010)
Abstract
Response Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9255-1 Authors Cynthia Forlini, Neuroethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, 110, ave des Pins Ouest, Montréal, QC Canada H2W 1R7 Eric Racine, Neuroethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, 110, ave des Pins Ouest, Montréal, QC Canada H2W 1R7 Journal Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Online ISSN 1872-4353 Print ISSN 1176-7529 Journal Volume Volume 7 Journal Issue Volume 7, Number 4Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Ethics of Neuroeducation: Research, Practice and Policy. [REVIEW]Bruce Maxwell & Eric Racine - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (2):101-103.
Toward a Postmodernist View of Conflict of Interest: Comment on “Toward a Sociology of Conflict of Interest in Medical Research” by Sarah Winch and Michael Sinnott.Elise Smith - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):223-224.
Unveiling the Past—Preparing the Conditions for Human Beings to Live in the Midst of One Another Again? A Response From Living in Northern Ireland: Comment on “Truth in Reconciliation” by Alphonso Lingis.Derick Wilson - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):333-335.
Managing Conflicts of Interest Should Begin with Dialogue and Education, Not Punitive Measures: Comment on “Toward a Sociology of Conflict of Interest in Medical Research” by Sarah Winch and Michael Sinnott.Ghislaine Mathieu & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):221-222.
The Strange Case of Dr. B and Mr. Hide: Ethical Sensitivity as a Means to Reflect Upon One’s Actions in Managing Conflict of Interest: Comment on “Toward a Sociology of Conflict of Interest in Medical Research” by Sarah Winch and Michael Sinnott. [REVIEW]Marie-Josée Potvin - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):225-227.
Allhoff, Fritz, Patrick Lin, and Daniel Moore. 2010. What is nanotechnology and why does it matter? From science to ethics: Walden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN: 978-1-4051-7545-6. 304 pp.Jennifer Kuzma - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):209-211.
Turning a Blind Eye Is Unreasonable, Unprofessional, and Unethical: Comment on “To Report or Not to Report: That is the Question” by Malcolm Parker.Anthony G. Tuckett - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):115-116.
Toward a Sociology of Conflict of Interest in Medical Research.Sarah Winch & Michael Sinnott - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):389-391.
Republication: In that case. [REVIEW]Malcolm Parker - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (2):373-373.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-11-18
Downloads
44 (#343,283)
6 months
7 (#339,156)
2010-11-18
Downloads
44 (#343,283)
6 months
7 (#339,156)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Visions and Ethics in Current Discourse on Human Enhancement.Arianna Ferrari, Christopher Coenen & Armin Grunwald - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (3):215-229.
References found in this work
Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy.Henry Greely, Barbara Sahakian, John Harris, Ronald Kessler, Gazzaniga C., Campbell Michael, Farah Philip & J. Martha - 2008 - Nature 456:702-705.
The use of methylphenidate among students: the future of enhancement?S. M. Outram - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (4):198-202.
Disagreements with implications: diverging discourses on the ethics of non-medical use of methylphenidate for performance enhancement.Cynthia Forlini & Eric Racine - 2009 - BMC Medical Ethics 10 (1):9.
Autonomy and coercion in academic “cognitive enhancement” using methylphenidate: Perspectives of key stakeholders. [REVIEW]Cynthia Forlini & Eric Racine - 2009 - Neuroethics 2 (3):163-177.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-67rzb uwo