Paper: Rethinking scientific responsibility

Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (5):299-302 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Researchers should be made co-responsible for the wider consequences of their research focus and the application of their findings. This paper describes a meta-reflection procedure that can be used as a tool to enhance scientific responsibility and reflective practice. The point of departure is that scientific practice is situated in power relations, has direction and, consequently, power implications. The contextual preconditions and implications of research should be stated and discussed openly. The reflection method aims at revealing both upstream elements, such as for instance preconceptions, and downstream elements, for example, public consequences of research. The validity of research might improve from such discussions. Validity should preferably be understood as a broader concept than the methodological concerns in science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Co-responsibility for research integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
Science and Ethical Value.Viera Bilasová - 2013 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 3 (3-4):111-116.
Is there an ivory tower in reality?E. Mamchur - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):101 – 111.
The Moral Terrain of Science.Heather Douglas - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S5):1-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
13 (#1,013,785)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references