Large cardinals and definable counterexamples to the continuum hypothesis

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 76 (1):47-97 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we consider whether L(R) has “enough information” to contain a counterexample to the continuum hypothesis. We believe this question provides deep insight into the difficulties surrounding the continuum hypothesis. We show sufficient conditions for L(R) not to contain such a counterexample. Along the way we establish many results about nonstationary towers, non-reflecting stationary sets, generalizations of proper and semiproper forcing and Chang's conjecture

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,941

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

SH plus CH does not imply stationary antichains.Chaz Schlindwein - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 124 (1-3):233-265.
On measurable cardinals violating the continuum hypothesis.Moti Gitik - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 63 (3):227-240.
The borel conjecture.Haim Judah, Saharon Shelah & W. H. Woodin - 1990 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 50 (3):255-269.
Some principles related to Chang's conjecture.Hans-Dieter Donder & Jean-Pierre Levinski - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 45 (1):39-101.
Proper forcing and l(ℝ).Itay Neeman & Jindrich Zapletal - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):801-810.
Stationary and closed rainbow subsets.Shimon Garti & Jing Zhang - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (2):102887.
Organic and tight.J. Cummings, M. Foreman & E. Schimmerling - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160 (1):22-32.
Bounded forcing axioms and the continuum.David Asperó & Joan Bagaria - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 109 (3):179-203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
63 (#327,578)

6 months
7 (#655,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences.Phyllis McKay Illari & Jon Williamson - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):119-135.
Squares, scales and stationary reflection.James Cummings, Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (01):35-98.
Mechanistic Theories of Causality Part I.Jon Williamson - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (6):421-432.

View all 39 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Independence of the Continuum Hypothesis.Paul J. Cohen - 1963 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 50 (6):1143--8.
Saturated ideals.Kenneth Kunen - 1978 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (1):65-76.
Reflecting stationary sets.Menachem Magidor - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (4):755-771.
Forcing closed unbounded sets.Uri Abraham & Saharon Shelah - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (3):643-657.
On the size of closed unbounded sets.James E. Baumgartner - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 54 (3):195-227.

View all 8 references / Add more references