Abstract
[Graeme Forbes] In I, I summarize the semantics for the relational/notional distinction for intensional transitives developed in Forbes (2000b). In II-V I pursue issues about logical consequence which were either unsatisfactorily dealt with in that paper or, more often, not raised at all. I argue that weakening inferences, such as 'Perseus seeks a mortal gorgon, therefore Perseus seeks a gorgon', are valid, but that disjunction inferences, such as 'Perseus seeks a mortal gorgon, therefore Perseus seeks a mortal gorgon or an immortal gorgon', are invalid. Since 'a gorgon' and 'a mortal gorgon or an immortal gorgon' are extensionally and intensionally the same quantifier, it is not completely trivial to arrange the semantics of intensional transitives so that this classification of the inferences is obtained. (This paper is an abridged version of Forbes (2001a); the latter will be incorporated into a forthcoming monograph, Attitude Problems.) /// [Jennifer Saul] This paper discusses the question of which verbs are intensional transitives. In particular, I ask which verbs Forbes should take to be intensional transitives. I argue that it is very difficult to arrive at a clear and plausible understanding of what an intensional transitive is-making it difficult to answer these questions. I end by briefly raising some questions about the usefulness of the category of intensional transitives
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-8349.00090
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Intensional Perceptual Ascriptions.David Bourget - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (3):513-530.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

I—Graeme Forbes.Graeme Forbes - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):75-99.
Intensionality.Graeme Forbes & Jennifer Saul - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 76:75-119.
Review. [REVIEW]Graeme Forbes - 1989 - Synthese 79 (1):171-189.
How Much Substitutivity?Graeme Forbes - 1997 - Analysis 57 (2):109–113.
“But a Was Arbitrary...”.Graeme Forbes - 1993 - Philosophical Topics 21 (2):21-34.
The Metaphysics of Modality.Peter Simons - 1988 - Noûs 22 (3):465-467.
More on Counterpart Theory.Graeme Forbes - 1983 - Analysis 43 (3):149 - 152.
The Metaphysics of Modality.Dorothy Edgington - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (152):365-370.
Reply to Marks.Graeme Forbes - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):281 - 295.
Indexicals.Graeme Forbes - 1989 - In Dov Gabbay & Franz Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 463--490.
Response to Garrett.Graeme Forbes - 1986 - Philosophical Books 27 (2):72-77.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
158 ( #73,232 of 2,499,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes