Historical Reconstruction: Gaining Epistemic Access to the Deep Past

Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 3 (20130604) (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We discuss the scientific task of historical reconstruction and the problem of epistemic access. We argue that strong epistemic support for historical claims consists in the consilience of multiple independent lines of evidence, and analyze the impact hypothesis for the End-Cretaceous mass extinction to illustrate the accrual of epistemic support. Although there are elements of the impact hypothesis that enjoy strong epistemic support, the general conditions for this are strict, and help to clarify the difficulties associated with reconstructing the deep past.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3998/ptb.6959004.0003.003

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Testing Times: Confirmation in the Historical Sciences.Ben Jeffares - 2008 - Dissertation, Australian National University
Freshest Advices on What To Do With the Historical Method in Philosophy When Using It to Study a Little Bit of Philosophy That Has Been Lost to History.Bennett Gilbert - 2012 - Essays in Philosophy 13 (1):106-118.
Epistemic Equivalence and Epistemic Incapacitation.Dana Tulodziecki - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (2):313-328.
Evidence and Justification in Groups with Conflicting Background Beliefs.Kent W. Staley - 2010 - Episteme 7 (3):232-247.
On the Need for Epistemic Enhancement.John Danaher - 2013 - Law, Innovation and Technology 5 (1):85-112.
Journal of the history of philosophy 43: 2 April.Jon Miller - manuscript
Regress Argument Reconstruction.Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):489-503.
Evidence and events in history.Leon J. Goldstein - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (2):175-194.
Explaining the past in the geosciences.Robert John Inkpen - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (4):495-507.
Epistemic responsibility.J. Angelo Corlett - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2):179 – 200.
Psychoanalytic Theory: A Historical Reconstruction.Sebastian Gardner - 2012 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):41-60.
Epistemic inertia and epistemic isolationism: A response to Buchanan.Neil C. Manson - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):291-298.
Why There are No Epistemic Duties.Chase B. Wrenn - 2007 - Dialogue: The Canadian Philosophical Review 46 (1):115-136.
Understanding, Integration, and Epistemic Value.Georgi Gardiner - 2012 - Acta Analytica 27 (2):163-181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-10

Downloads
119 (#145,846)

6 months
21 (#116,730)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick Forber
Tufts University

Citations of this work

A second look at the colors of the dinosaurs.Derek D. Turner - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:60-68.
Introduction: Scientific knowledge of the deep past.Adrian Currie & Derek Turner - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:43-46.

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Novum Organon Renovatum.William Whewell - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):186-211.

View all 25 references / Add more references