Expectations and the Limits of Legal Validity

Utilitas 27 (3):263-278 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Drawing on the work of Jeremy Bentham, we can forward a parity thesis concerning formal and substantive legal invalidity. Formal and substantive invalidity are, according to this thesis, traceable to the same source, namely, the sovereign's inability to adjust expectations to motivate obedience. The parity thesis, if defensible, has great appeal for positivists. Explaining why contradictory or contrary mandates yield invalidity is unproblematic. But providing an account of content-based invalidity invites the collapse of the separation between what the law is and what the law ought to be. Grounding formal and substantive invalidity in a unified source allows us to avoid bringing in any additional apparatus that might compromise this separation. This essay fleshes out and defends the parity thesis

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Invalidity.Riccardo Guastini - 1994 - Ratio Juris 7 (2):212-226.
Three separation theses.James Morauta - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 23 (2):111-135.
Logic and the Evaluation of Argument.Phillip James Staines - 1992 - Dissertation, University of New South Wales (Australia)
Agency of belief and intention.A. K. Flowerree - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2763-2784.
Prinzipien als Normen mit zwei Geltungsebenen.Maximilian Reßing - 2009 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 95 (1):28-48.
The First Amendment Invalidity of FCC Content Regulations.Jonathan Emord - 1992 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 6 (1):93-216.
The Asymmetry Thesis.Gary Iseminger - 1989 - The Monist 72 (1):25-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-20

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
37 (#101,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew T. Forcehimes
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.
The Concept of Law.Stuart M. Brown - 1963 - Philosophical Review 72 (2):250.
The Meaning of Imperatives.Nate Charlow - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (8):540-555.
The semiotic status of commands.Herbert Gaylord Bohnert - 1945 - Philosophy of Science 12 (4):302-315.
Logic and liberty.Philip Mullock - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 35 (3):217 - 238.

Add more references