Joshua Forstenzer
University of Sheffield
Over the last decade, Robert Talisse has developed a devastating argument against reviving John Dewey’s democratic ideal. In his book, A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy, and in other essays, Talisse has argued that Deweyan democracy fails to accommodate Rawls’ conception of “the fact of reasonable pluralism” because it is committed to a perfectionist conception of the good. In response, this article offers a Rawlsian rebuttal to Talisse by drawing on Rawls’ own characterisation of perfectionism to show that Dewey’s conception of the good is not perfectionist on Rawls’ account and thus can reasonably accommodate the fact of reasonable pluralism. is article thus begins by exposing and explaining Talisse’s argument, before articulating Shane Ralston’s rejection of the Berlinian and Rawlsian fillters presupposed by Talisse’s argument. Then, it develops its central argument by showing that, even if we accept the Rawlsian filter, Deweyan democracy does not fail to accommodate the fact of reasonable pluralism, because it only relies on a thin (not a full) theory of the good, before considering some foreseeable Talissean objections. Ultimately, the article concludes by showing that these objections fail because Deweyan democracy does not rely on a ‘full’ theory of the good.
Keywords Democracy  Dewey  Rawls  Talisse  Growth  Reasonable Pluralism  Perfectionism  Ralston
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.4.03
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.John Rawls - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (9):515-572.
John Rawls.Leif Wenar - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pragmatism and Progress. Kitcher - 2015 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51 (4):475.
Saving Pragmatist Democratic Theory.Robert Talisse - 2010 - Etica E Politica 12 (1):12-27.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Deweyan Democracy Defended.David Rondel - 2012 - Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):197-207.
Saving Pragmatist Democratic Theory.Robert Talisse - 2010 - Etica E Politica 12 (1):12-27.
A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy.Joshua Forstenzer - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):161-164.
A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy (Review).Philip R. Olson - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 631-633.
Deweyan Democracy and Pluralism: A Reunion.Shane Ralston - 2009 - Social Philosophy Today 25:223-240.
Toward a New Pragmatist Politics.Robert B. Talisse - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (5):552-571.
Can Democracy Be a Way of Life? Deweyan Democracy and the Problem of Pluralism.Robert B. Talisse - 2003 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 39 (1):1 - 21.
In Defense of Democracy as a Way of Life: A Reply to Talisse's Pluralist Objection.Shane J. Ralston - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):629-659.
Dewey, Pluralism, and Democracy: A Response to Robert Talisse.Robert Talisse - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1).


Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #313,926 of 2,499,813 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #48,536 of 2,499,813 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes