Deweyan Democracy, Robert Talisse, and the Fact of Reasonable Pluralism: A Rawlsian Response

Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53 (4):553 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Over the last decade, Robert Talisse has developed a devastating argument against reviving John Dewey’s democratic ideal. In his book, A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy, and in other essays, Talisse has argued that Deweyan democracy fails to accommodate Rawls’ conception of “the fact of reasonable pluralism” because it is committed to a perfectionist conception of the good. In response, this article offers a Rawlsian rebuttal to Talisse by drawing on Rawls’ own characterisation of perfectionism to show that Dewey’s conception of the good is not perfectionist on Rawls’ account and thus can reasonably accommodate the fact of reasonable pluralism. is article thus begins by exposing and explaining Talisse’s argument, before articulating Shane Ralston’s rejection of the Berlinian and Rawlsian fillters presupposed by Talisse’s argument. Then, it develops its central argument by showing that, even if we accept the Rawlsian filter, Deweyan democracy does not fail to accommodate the fact of reasonable pluralism, because it only relies on a thin (not a full) theory of the good, before considering some foreseeable Talissean objections. Ultimately, the article concludes by showing that these objections fail because Deweyan democracy does not rely on a ‘full’ theory of the good.

Similar books and articles

Deweyan Democracy Defended.David Rondel - 2012 - Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):197-207.
Saving Pragmatist Democratic Theory.Robert Talisse - 2010 - Etica E Politica 12 (1):12-27.
A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. [REVIEW]Joshua Forstenzer - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):161-164.
A pragmatist philosophy of democracy (review).Philip R. Olson - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 631-633.
Deweyan Democracy and Pluralism: A Reunion.Shane Ralston - 2009 - Social Philosophy Today 25:223-240.
Toward a New Pragmatist Politics.Robert B. Talisse - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (5):552-571.
Can Democracy Be a Way of Life? Deweyan Democracy and the Problem of Pluralism.Robert B. Talisse - 2003 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 39 (1):1 - 21.
In Defense of Democracy as a Way of Life: A Reply to Talisse's Pluralist Objection.Shane J. Ralston - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):629-659.
Dewey, Pluralism, and Democracy: A Response to Robert Talisse.Robert Talisse - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-23

Downloads
73 (#175,686)

6 months
22 (#68,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua Forstenzer
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kantian constructivism in moral theory.John Rawls - 1930 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (9):515-572.
John Rawls.Leif Wenar - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pragmatism and Progress.Philip Kitcher - 2015 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51 (4):475.
Deweyan Democracy and Pluralism: A Reunion.Shane Ralston - 2009 - Social Philosophy Today 25:223-240.

View all 6 references / Add more references