Considerations for applying bioethics norms to a biopharmaceutical industry setting

BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1) (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

BackgroundThe biopharmaceutical industry operates at the intersection of life sciences, clinical research, clinical care, public health, and business, which presents distinct operational and ethical challenges. This setting merits focused bioethics consideration to complement legal compliance and business ethics efforts. However, bioethics as applied to a biopharmaceutical industry setting often is construed either too broadly or too narrowly with little examination of its proper scope.Main textAny institution with a scientific or healthcare mission should engage bioethics norms to navigate ethical issues that arise from the conduct of biomedical research, delivery of clinical care, or implementation of public health programs. It is reasonable to assume that while bioethics norms must remain constant, their application will vary depending on the characteristics of a given setting. Context “specification” substantively refines ethics norms for a particular discipline or setting and is an expected, needed and progressive ethical activity. In order for this activity to be meaningful, the scope for bioethics application and the relevant contextual factors of the setting need to be delineated and appreciated. This paper defines biopharmaceutical bioethics as: the application of bioethics norms (concepts, principles, and rules) to the research, development, supply, commercialization, and clinical use of biopharmaceutical healthcare products. It provides commentary on this definition, and presents five contextual factors that need to be considered when applying bioethics norms to a biopharmaceutical industry setting: (1) dual missions; (2) timely and pragmatic guidance; (3) resource stewardship; (4) multiple stakeholders; and (5) operational complexity.ConclusionUnderstanding the scope of the biopharmaceutical enterprise and contextual factors of a biopharmaceutical industry setting is foundational for the application of bioethics norms. Establishing a common language and approach for biopharmaceutical bioethics will facilitate breadth and depth of discussion and subsequent implementation to benefit patients, the healthcare system and society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Clinical ethics and values: how do norms evolve from practice?Marta Spranzi - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (1):93-103.
The Setting up of a National Bioethics Committee – Social and Cultural Considerations.Siti Nurani Mohd Nor - 2009 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 19 (4):110-112.
Methodological Relationship between Bioethics and Philosophy.Natalia N. Sedova & Boris A. Navrotskiy - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 3:111-114.
The ethics of bioethics: Mapping the moral landscape.Carolyn Ells - 2010 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (2):170-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-26

Downloads
13 (#1,013,785)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Ethics and regulation of clinical research.Robert J. Levine - 1981 - Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.

View all 24 references / Add more references