Wendell Fortson, Kathleen Novak Stern, Curtis Chang, Angela Rossetti, Ariella Kelman, Michael Turik, Donald G. Therasse, Tatjana Poplazarova & Luann E. Van Campen
BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1) (2021)
AbstractBackgroundThe biopharmaceutical industry operates at the intersection of life sciences, clinical research, clinical care, public health, and business, which presents distinct operational and ethical challenges. This setting merits focused bioethics consideration to complement legal compliance and business ethics efforts. However, bioethics as applied to a biopharmaceutical industry setting often is construed either too broadly or too narrowly with little examination of its proper scope.Main textAny institution with a scientific or healthcare mission should engage bioethics norms to navigate ethical issues that arise from the conduct of biomedical research, delivery of clinical care, or implementation of public health programs. It is reasonable to assume that while bioethics norms must remain constant, their application will vary depending on the characteristics of a given setting. Context “specification” substantively refines ethics norms for a particular discipline or setting and is an expected, needed and progressive ethical activity. In order for this activity to be meaningful, the scope for bioethics application and the relevant contextual factors of the setting need to be delineated and appreciated. This paper defines biopharmaceutical bioethics as: the application of bioethics norms to the research, development, supply, commercialization, and clinical use of biopharmaceutical healthcare products. It provides commentary on this definition, and presents five contextual factors that need to be considered when applying bioethics norms to a biopharmaceutical industry setting: dual missions; timely and pragmatic guidance; resource stewardship; multiple stakeholders; and operational complexity.ConclusionUnderstanding the scope of the biopharmaceutical enterprise and contextual factors of a biopharmaceutical industry setting is foundational for the application of bioethics norms. Establishing a common language and approach for biopharmaceutical bioethics will facilitate breadth and depth of discussion and subsequent implementation to benefit patients, the healthcare system and society.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Hooked: Ethics, the Medical Profession, and the Pharmaceutical Industry.Howard Brody - 2007 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Resolving Ethical Dilemmas: A Guide for Clinicians.Bernard Lo - 1994 - Williams & Wilkins.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Considerations for Unblinding in Biopharmaceutical Industry Sponsored Trials.J. Jina Shah & John Bond - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (10):68-70.
Bioethics in a Secular World: The Ethics and the Application.Matthew Tieu - 2012 - Bioethics Research Notes 24 (1):15.
Methodology of the Relationship Between Bioethics, Philosophy, and Law.Natalia Sedova - 2013 - Philosophy Study 3 (7).
Priority Setting From the Lens of Justice in Existing Health Care Industry of Pakistan.Faisal Nadeem - 2017 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 9 (1).
Religious and Cultural Legitimacy of Bioethics: Lessons From Islamic Bioethics. [REVIEW]Ayman Shabana - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):671-677.
Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Orphan Drug Development: Insights From the US and the EU Biopharmaceutical Industry. [REVIEW]Olga Bruyaka, Hanko K. Zeitzmann, Isabelle Chalamon, Richard E. Wokutch & Pooja Thakur - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (1):45-65.
Clinical Ethics and Values: How Do Norms Evolve From Practice?Marta Spranzi - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (1):93-103.
The Setting Up of a National Bioethics Committee – Social and Cultural Considerations.Siti Nurani Mohd Nor - 2009 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 19 (4):110-112.
Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century.Ronald M. Green, Aine Donovan & Steven A. Jauss (eds.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press UK.
Beyond a Western Bioethics in Asia and Its Implication on Autonomy.Mark Tan Kiak Min - 2017 - The New Bioethics 23 (2):154-164.
Methodological Relationship Between Bioethics and Philosophy.Natalia N. Sedova & Boris A. Navrotskiy - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 3:111-114.
Setting Standards for Empirical Bioethics Research: A Response to Carter and Cribb.Michael Dunn, Jonathan Ives, Bert Molewijk & Jan Schildmann - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):66.
Setting Health‐Care Priorities: What Ethical Theories Tell Us.Maxwell J. Smith - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):442-443.
The Ethics of Bioethics: Mapping the Moral Landscape.Carolyn Ells - 2010 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (2):170-175.
Exploring the Ethics of Global Health Research Priority-Setting.Bridget Pratt, Mark Sheehan, Nicola Barsdorf & Adnan A. Hyder - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):94.