Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (1):89-105 (2008)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Software agents’ ability to interact within different open systems, designed by different groups, presupposes an agreement on an unambiguous definition of a set of concepts, used to describe the context of the interaction and the communication language the agents can use. Agents’ interactions ought to allow for reliable expectations on the possible evolution of the system; however, in open systems interacting agents may not conform to predefined specifications. A possible solution is to define interaction environments including a normative component, with suitable rules to regulate the behaviour of agents. To tackle this problem we propose an application-independent metamodel of artificial institutions that can be used to define open multiagent systems. In our view an artificial institution is made up by an ontology that models the social context of the interaction, a set of authorizations to act on the institutional context, a set of linguistic conventions for the performance of institutional actions and a system of norms that are necessary to constrain the agents’ actions.
|
Keywords | Artificial institutions Open systems Norms Conventions Commitments |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10506-007-9055-z |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Rogers Searle - 1969 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
The Construction of Social Reality. Anthony Freeman in Conversation with John Searle.J. Searle & A. Freeman - 1995 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (2):180-189.
A Formal Characterisation Of Institutionalised Power.Andrew Jones & Marek Sergot - 1996 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 4 (3):427-443.
An Ontology for Commitments in Multiagent Systems. [REVIEW]Munindar P. Singh - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (1):97-113.
Citations of this work BETA
Executable Specification of Open Multi-Agent Systems.Alexander Artikis & Marek Sergot - 2010 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 18 (1):31-65.
Similar books and articles
The Ontological Properties of Social Roles in Multi-Agent Systems: Definitional Dependence, Powers and Roles Playing Roles. [REVIEW]Guido Boella & Leendert van der Torre - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (3):201-221.
Institutional Robotics.Porfirio Silva & Pedro U. Lima - 2007 - In F. Almeida e Costa et al (ed.), Advances in Artificial Life. ECAL 2007. Springer Verlag.
A Multiagent Approach to Modelling Complex Phenomena.Francesco Amigoni & Viola Schiaffonati - 2008 - Foundations of Science 13 (2):113-125.
Building Computational Institutions for Agents with Rolex.Giacomo Cabri, Luca Ferrari & Rossella Rubino - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (1):129-145.
Economic Ethics and Institutional Change.Antonio Argandoña - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):191-201.
Towards an Artificial User: The “What” Problem for an Architecture Capable of Developing New Goals.Vincenzo Tagliasco - unknown
An Ontology for Commitments in Multiagent Systems. [REVIEW]Munindar P. Singh - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (1):97-113.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
41 ( #276,720 of 2,507,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,140 of 2,507,591 )
2009-01-28
Total views
41 ( #276,720 of 2,507,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,140 of 2,507,591 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads