Intuition between the analytic-continental divide: Hermann Weyl's philosophy of the continuum

Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):25-55 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Though logical positivism is part of Kant's complex legacy, positivists rejected both Kant's theory of intuition and his classification of mathematical knowledge as synthetic a priori. This paper considers some lingering defenses of intuition in mathematics during the early part of the twentieth century, as logical positivism was born. In particular, it focuses on the difficult and changing views of Hermann Weyl about the proper role of intuition in mathematics. I argue that it was not intuition in general, but his commitment to twodifferent types of intuition, which explains his rather unusual and tormented philosophy of the mathematical continuum. I would like to thank Geoff Gorham, David McCarty, and Rosamond Rodman for reading an earlier draft of this work. I should also thank those who provided helpful comments on several distant ancestors of this paper: Emily Carson, Ulrich Majer, Erhard Scholz, John Schuerman, Stewart Shapiro, and Richard Tieszen. I am indebted to two anonymous referees for pointing out some problems and for pointing me to work on Weyl I did not previously know about. In particular, the recent articles in [Feist, 2004a] turned out to be (somewhat uncomfortably) relevant to the focus of this paper. In this last revision I have tried to show where I agree and disagree with the authors of those papers; I apologize for whatever repetition still exists, but it was tere before I read those papers. This paper has a long history, and comes out of several talks I gave some years ago. Audiences at the Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh (colloquium 1995), St Andrews University Philosophy of Mathematics Workshop (1996), the British Society for the History of Mathematics meeting (1996), the University of Mainz Mathematics Department (colloquium 1996), the Canadian Philosophical Association (1997 and 1999), and the University of British Columbia (colloquium 1998) should be thanked for their helpful comments. I also thank Neil Tennant for encouraging me to resurrect this work. CiteULike    Connotea    What's this?



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hermann Weyl on intuition and the continuum.John L. Bell - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):259-273.
Synthesis, Sensibility, and Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics.Carol A. Van Kirk - 1986 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986 (1):135-144.
The epistemological status of computer-assisted proofs.Mark McEvoy - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (3):374-387.
Husserl and Weyl.Jairo Silva - 2017 - In Stefania Centrone (ed.), Essays on Husserl’s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.
Kant on Intuition in Geometry.Emily Carson - 1997 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (4):489 - 512.
Nominalism and Mathematical Intuition.Otávio Bueno - 2008 - ProtoSociology 25:89-107.


Added to PP

68 (#245,849)

6 months
4 (#862,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Janet Folina
Macalester College

References found in this work

Ideas.Edmund Husserl - 1969 - New York,: Humanities P..
Ideas.Edmund Husserl - 1931 - New York,: Routledge.

View all 22 references / Add more references