Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks [Book Review]

International Studies in Philosophy 32 (2):138-139 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers and Shrieks. [REVIEW]P. E. Hodgson - 1996 - International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (4):494-495.
Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks. [REVIEW]Craig Callender - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (1):142-146.
Review of Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks. [REVIEW]Douglas Kutach - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):649-651.
Critical Notice.Steven F. Savitt - 1999 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):479-490.
Review of "Bangs, crunches, shrieks, whispers" by J Earman. [REVIEW]Graham Oppy - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):352-4.
Bangs, crunches, wimps, and geeks. [REVIEW]G. Belot - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (2):273-275.
Plantinga properties and the ontological argument.Bangs L. Tapscott - 1971 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 31 (4):604-605.
Correcting the tableau procedure for ${\rm S}4$.Bangs L. Tapscott - 1984 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25 (3):241-249.
A simplified natural deduction approach to certain modal systems.Bangs L. Tapscott - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (3):371-384.
Armageddon science: the science of mass destruction.Brian Clegg - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: St. Martin's Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
15 (#923,100)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references