Task-Irrelevant Expectation Violations in Sequential Manual Actions: Evidence for a “Check-after-Surprise” Mode of Visual Attention and Eye-Hand Decoupling

Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How can you be surprised? The case for volatile expectations.Roberto Casati & Elena Pasquinelli - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):171-183.
Perceptual decoupling or motor decoupling?James Head & William S. Helton - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):913-919.
The Metaphysics of Wonder and Surprise.R. V. Feldman - 1934 - Philosophy 9 (34):209 - 213.
Encoding and retrieval in visual memory tasks.Nancy Frost - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):317.
Attention shuts out irrelevant stimuli.Bruce Bridgeman - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):769-769.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-24

Downloads
16 (#886,588)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Toward an instance theory of automatization.Gordon D. Logan - 1988 - Psychological Review 95 (4):492-527.
Toward an Instance Theory of Automatization.G. D. Logan - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (5):342-342.
A theory of visual attention.Claus Bundesen - 1990 - Psychological Review 97 (4):523-547.

View all 10 references / Add more references