MIT Press (2000)
AbstractJerry Fodor argues against the widely held view that mental processes are largely computations, that the architecture of cognition is massively modular, and...
Similar books and articles
Yes, it does: A diatribe on Jerry Fodor's the mind doesn't work that way.Susan Schneider - 2007 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness.
The mind doesn't work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology.Josh Weisberg - manuscript
A critical review of Jerry A. Fodor's the mind doesn't work that way. [REVIEW]Daniel Weiskopf - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):551 – 562.
On Fodor's The Mind Doesn't Work That Way.Daniel A. Weiskopf - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):551-562.
Natural selection doesn't work that way: Jerry Fodor vs. evolutionary psychology on gradualism and saltationism.Andre Ariew - 2003 - Mind and Language 18 (5):478-483.
Review of Jerry Fodor, the mind doesnt work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. [REVIEW]John Sutton - 2001 - Metapsychology 5 (7).
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Thinking is Believing.Eric Mandelbaum - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):55-96.
Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds.Derek C. Penn, Keith J. Holyoak & Daniel J. Povinelli - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):109-130.
The uses and abuses of the personal/subpersonal distinction.Zoe Drayson - 2012 - Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):1-18.
Relevance theory.Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber - 2002 - In L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Blackwell. pp. 607-632.
(Nonsolipsistic) conceptual role semantics.Gilbert Harman - 1987 - In Ernest LePore (ed.), New Directions in Semantics. London: Academic Press. pp. 55–81.
References found in this work
No references found.