Self-Responsibility, Tradition, and the Apparent Good

Studia Phaenomenologica 11:55-76 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The crucial distinction for ethics is between the good and the apparent good, between being and seeming. Tradition is useful for developing our ability to make this distinction and to live ethically or in self-responsibility, but it is also threatening to this ability. The phenomenology of Husserl and of others in the Husserlian tradition, especially Robert Sokolowski, are helpful in spelling out how tradition works; how the difference between the apparent good and the good is bridged in the experience of moral truth but also a permanent, challenging feature of human life; what ethics requires regarding self-responsibility or authenticity; and what the proper voice of tradition is in the ethical or moral life.

Similar books and articles

The Good life and the human good.Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) - 1992 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
The common good and Christian ethics.David Hollenbach - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The stakeholder theory and the common good.Antonio Argandoña - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1093-1102.
Free will and moral responsibility.John Martin Fischer - 2004 - In David Copp (ed.), Handbook on Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press.
General Preface to the Project.Stephen David Ross - 2010 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:1-5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
1,112 (#10,867)

6 months
104 (#35,761)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Molly Brigid McGrath
Assumption College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references