Modalité et changement: δύναμις et cinétique aristotélicienne

Dissertation, Université Catholique de Louvain (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The present PhD dissertation aims to examine the relation between modality and change in Aristotle’s metaphysics. On the one hand, Aristotle supports his modal realism (i.e., worldly objects have modal properties - potentialities and essences - that ground the ascriptions of possibility and necessity) by arguing that the rejection of modal realism makes change inexplicable, or, worse, banishes it from the realm of reality. On the other hand, the Stagirite analyses processes by means of modal notions (‘change is the actuality of what is virtual insofar as it is virtual’). In other words: to grasp what change is, one has to resort to the modal idiom of potentialities, while the fact that there is change is indicative of the fact that nature is full of modal properties. Aristotle’s modal and kinetic realism finds a negative in the figure of the Megaric Diodorus Kronus. The polemical situation of Greek philosophy has indeed the dialectical advantage of not opposing the Aristotelian position to a sui generis straw man. Both in its reduction of modal judgements to temporal quantifications and in its dissolution of the reality of the state-of-being-in-motion in favour of a cinematographic view of processes, the philosophical figure of reductionist antirealism embodied by Diodorus constitutes an alternative that takes the opposite view of Aristotle’s realism. The present study is structured as a discussion between these two positions. In the face of Diodorus’ antirealist challenges, Aristotle articulates modal and kinetic considerations: the answers he gives to Diodorus’ puzzles thus provide valuable insight into his metaphysics. Moreover, the examination of Aristotle’s and Diodorus’ metaphysics, because of their insight and originality, will not fail to interest the philosopher concerned with the metaphysical foundations of modern physics, insofar as the entanglement between modalities and processes is nowadays at the core of mechanics (phase spaces, path integrals, etc.).



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Chrysippus' Modal Logic and Its Relation to Philo and Diodorus.Susanne Bobzien - 1993 - In Klaus Döring & Theodor Ebert (eds.), Dialektiker und Stoiker. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. pp. 63--84.
Diodorus Cronus and the Logic of Time.Massie Pascal - 2016 - Review of Metaphysics 70 (2):279-309.
Time and Necessity. [REVIEW]S. L. - 1975 - Review of Metaphysics 29 (2):343-344.
The Master Argument of Diodorus Cronus.Anton F. Mikel - 1992 - Dissertation, The Florida State University
Two Concepts of Modality.Alvin Plantinga - 2003 - In Alvin Plantinga & Matthew Davidson (eds.), Essays in the metaphysics of modality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Die stoische Modallogik (Stoic Modal Logic).Susanne Bobzien - 1986 - Wuerzburg: Koenigshausen and Neumann.
Dialectical school.Susanne Bobzien - 2012 - In Ed Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aristotle's Modal Logic: Essence and Entailment in the Organon.Richard Patterson - 1995 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.


Added to PP

453 (#46,910)

6 months
213 (#15,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Florian Marion
Université Catholique de Louvain

References found in this work

What do philosophers believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Timothy Williamson - 2013 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy Within its Proper Bounds.Edouard Machery - 2017 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

View all 594 references / Add more references