Cupiditas veri videndi: Pierre de villemandy's dogmatic vs. cicero's sceptical interpretation of 'man's desire to know

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (1):29–56 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Throughout history, dogmatists and sceptics of various branches have been inclined to agree on the description of man as a 'filaletes zoon' - a 'truth-loving animal' as Sextus Empiricus had defined him - on the fact that 'the desire to know is innate in man' and on interpreting this as the ideal force inspiring the search for knowledge. The two parties have, however, always dissented considerably about the consequences to be drawn from such a vision of man as a knowledge-seeker. This paper seeks to clarify the discrepancies occurring between the sceptical and the dogmatic understanding of man's epistemophilics impulse, through first using the metaphysical argument ex communi omnium sciendi desiderio proposed by Pierre de Villemandy in his Scepticismus Debellatus, and then Cicero's more sceptical and purely anthropological reading of the characterization of man as a knowledge-seeker. The paper then goes on to discuss the salient features that in different times and manners have characterized the philosophical debate on the topic.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
276 (#67,037)

6 months
93 (#38,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luciano Floridi
Yale University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Treatise of Human Nature.P. H. Nidditch (ed.) - 1978 - Oxford University Press.
A. C. Grayling, "The Refutation of Scepticism".Ralph C. S. Walker - 1986 - Philosophical Quarterly 36 (145):564.
Scepticism.Oliver A. Johnson - 1981 - Philosophy 56 (218):591-592.
That Nothing is Known.Elaine Limbrick & Douglas F. S. Thomson (eds.) - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references