Mr. Hare and Naturalism

Analysis 15 (4):82 - 85 (1954)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The author criticises chapter 5 of r m hare's "the language of morals" in which hare tries to show why naturalism is "untenable." the author concludes that hare's analysis as well as the naturalists' "keep us from saying what we do say and want to say." (staff)



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naturalism.R. M. Hare - 1952 - In Richard Mervyn Hare (ed.), The Language of Morals. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Rejoinder to Wall.Scott Forschler - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (4):572-574.
The Moral Philosophy of R.M. Hare: A Vindication of Utilitarianism?Patrick A. Adu-Amankwah - 1997 - Peter Lang Incorporated, International Academic Publishers.
Foot and Hare on naturalism.M. B. E. Smith - 1974 - Metaphilosophy 5 (3):187–197.
Mr. Hare and the conscientious nazi.Alan Donagan - 1965 - Philosophical Studies 16 (1-2):8 - 12.
Imperative and deontic logic.Peter Geach - 1957 - Analysis 18 (3):49-56.
Plato and the Mathematicians: An Examination of Professor Hare's Views.Christopher Charles Whiston Taylor - 1967 - [Published for the Scots Philosophical Club by the University of St. Andrews].
Hare's Theory of Morals.David Kent Carter - 1982 - Dissertation, Yale University
Review of R. M. Hare, Sorting out Ethics[REVIEW]Anthony Skelton - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):583-585.


Added to PP

68 (#83,825)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references