Imposed subservience: a cautionary note on misuses of Jacques Rancière's taxonomy of art

Abstract

Many in the art world have embraced the thinking of the political philosopher Jacques Rancière, who offers some valuable tools for art criticism. The danger, this chapter argues, is that Rancière's philosophy contains the kernel of a populist approach to artistic production that, if misappropriated by artists or curators too eager to champion Rancière's cause, could undermine artists' capacity for individual expression and subversion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Why Rancière now?Joseph J. Tanke - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (2):pp. 1-17.
Jacques Rancière: Literature and Equality.Todd May - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (1):83-92.
Rancière in South Carolina.Todd May - 2009 - In Gabriel Rockhill & Philip Watts (eds.), Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Duke University Press.
Rancière and metaphysics.Jean-Luc Nancy - 2009 - In Gabriel Rockhill & Philip Watts (eds.), Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Duke University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-08

Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references