Abstract
Many in the art world have embraced the thinking of the political philosopher Jacques Rancière, who offers some valuable tools for art criticism. The danger, this chapter argues, is that Rancière's philosophy contains the kernel of a populist approach to artistic production that, if misappropriated by artists or curators too eager to champion Rancière's cause, could undermine artists' capacity for individual expression and subversion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Rancière Now?Joseph J. Tanke - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (2):pp. 1-17.
Scenes of Aesthetic Education: Rancière, Oedipus, and Notre Musique. de Boever - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (3):69-82.
Jacques Rancière: Literature and Equality.Todd May - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (1):83-92.
Rancière in South Carolina.Todd May - 2009 - In Gabriel Rockhill & Philip Watts (eds.), Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Duke University Press.
Rancière and Metaphysics.Jean-Luc Nancy - 2009 - In Gabriel Rockhill & Philip Watts (eds.), Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Duke University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-08

Total views
9 ( #947,503 of 2,499,225 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,225 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes