Challenging Doris’ Attack on Aggregation: Why We are Not Left “Completely in the Dark” about Global Virtues

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (3):519-536 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aggregation shows that virtue-relevant behavior is indeed highly predictable, and that individual differences in global virtues do indeed exist. Aggregation is a key response to the situationist argument against the existence of broad virtues. However, a concern with aggregation is that, because it is an average, the specifics of what are included in that average matter. In particular, if heinous actions could be included in the average, then aggregates cannot provide enough confidence that the holders of high aggregates have not conducted heinous actions and thus cannot provide enough confidence that such people qualify as virtuous. Doris has challenged aggregation with this concern, and no one has responded substantively to this challenge. If Doris’ challenge is in fact correct, then the situationist argument against the existence of broad virtues stands. In the article, we present a full response to this concern. We argue that aggregation does not in fact allow heinous exceptions, because aggregates do indeed predict extreme single behaviors very well. In fact, aggregates do allow confidence that holders of high aggregates do not commit heinous actions. Thus, Doris’ rejection of the aggregation solution does not defeat aggregation, aggregation continues to stand in the defense of global virtues, and the situationist argument does not threaten the existence and predictive power of global virtues. Models of traits that rely on aggregates, such as Whole Trait Theory, may provide useful post-situationist models of virtues.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,491

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2007 - Social Choice and Welfare 29 (1):19-33.
Aggregation and Numbers.Iawo Hirose - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (1):62-79.
Aggregation and numbers.Iwao Hirose - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (1):62-79.
Moral Aggregation.Iwao Hirose - 2014 - New York, US: Oup Usa.
Aggregating Causal Judgments.Richard Bradley, Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (4):491-515.
The Possibility of Virtue.Miguel Alzola - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2):377-404.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-06

Downloads
22 (#598,801)

6 months
1 (#1,008,020)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior.John M. Doris - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Character as Moral Fiction.Mark Alfano - 2013 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references