Authors
Edmund Tweedy Flanigan
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
Abstract
It is an orthodoxy of modern political thought that violence is morally incompatible with politics, with the important exception of the permissible violence carried out by the state. The “commonsense argument” for permissible political violence denies this by extending the principles of defensive ethics to the context of state-subject interaction. This article has two aims: First, I critically investigate the commonsense argument and its limits. I argue that the scope of permissions it licenses is significantly more limited than its proponents allow. Second, I develop an alternative (and supplementary) framework for thinking about permissible political violence. I argue that under certain circumstances, subjects may violently protest their treatment, where protest is understood as an expression of rejection of those circumstances. On my view, protest, including violent protest, is permissible when it is the fitting response to those circumstances. This alternative framework accounts for an important class of cases of intuitively permissible political violence, including cases in which such violence does not serve strategic political ends or is even counterproductive towards those ends.
Keywords Protest  Violence  Defensive ethics  Fittingness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13698230.2020.1870859
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 1651 - Harmondsworth, Penguin.
Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The Aptness of Anger.Amia Srinivasan - 2018 - Journal of Political Philosophy 26 (2):123-144.
The Wrong Kind of Reason.Pamela Hieronymi - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy 102 (9):437 - 457.

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Studies of Political Protest Domestic Science.R. Balaban - 2017 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 35 (1):122-137.
Blame and Protest.Eugene Chislenko - 2019 - The Journal of Ethics 23 (2):163-181.
Factors Inflencing the Formation of Potential Protest Activity of Citizens of Ukraine.Mohamed Ali Belhasem - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4:38-45.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-22

Total views
739 ( #10,274 of 2,519,866 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #10,033 of 2,519,866 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes